THE ROLES OF JUDGES IN DEMOCRACIES: a realistic view
Palavras-chave:Judges, Democracy, Roles
ResumoWhat are the “obligations” of judges in democracies? An adequate answer requires us to be realistic both about democracies and about law. Realism about democracy demands that we recognize that electoral outcomes are largely, though not entirely, unrelated to concrete policy choices by elected representatives or to the policy preferences of voters, who typically follow their party based on “tribal” loyalties. The latter fact renders irrelevant the classic counter-majoritarian (or counter-democratic) worries about judicial review. Realism about law requires that we recognize that judges, especially on appellate courts, will inevitably have to render moral and political judgments in order to produce authoritative resolutions of disputes, one of the central functions of a legal system in any society. That means it is impossible to discuss the “obligations” of judges without regard to their actual moral and political views, as well as the moral and political ends we believe ought to be achieved.
Achen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
Barnett, Randy E. 2004. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Hegel. New York: Routledge.
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Bositis, David A. Blacks and the 2012 Democratic National Convention. Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. https://jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/Blacks%20and%20the%202012%20Democratic%20National%20Convention.pdf. Accessed 7 January 2019.
Brest, Paul. 1980. The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding. Boston University Law Review 60: 204-238.
Bump, Philip. 2016. Donald Trump got Reagan-like support from union households. Washington Post, November 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/donald-trump-got-reagan-like-support-from-union-households/?utm_term=.201cdd53fd28.
Cohn, Nate. 2016. How the Obama Coalition Crumbled, Leaving an Opening for Trump. New York Times, December 23. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/23/upshot/how-the-obama-coalition-crumbled-leaving-an-opening-for-trump.html.
Cohn, Nate. 2017. The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think. New York Times, August 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/upshot/the-obama-trump-voters-are-real-heres-what-they-think.html.
Colquhoun, David. 2014. An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. Royal Society Open Science 1, no. 3 (November). doi: 10.1098/rsos.140216.
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1983. Statutes’ Domains. University of Chicago Law Review 50, no. 2 (Spring): 533-552.
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1994. Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17, no. 1 (Winter): 61-70.
Ekins, Richard. 2012. The Nature of Legislative Intent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finkelman, Paul. 1981. An Imperfect Union: Slavery, Federalism, and Comity. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Fowler, Anthony, and Andrew B. Hall. 2018. Do Shark Attacks Influence Presidential Elections? Reassessing a Prominent Finding on Voter Competence. The Journal of Politics 80, no. 4 (October): 1423-1437. doi: 10.1086/699244.
Gardiner, Stephen M., and David A. Weisbach. 2016. Debating Climate Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 3 (September): 564-581. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714001595.
Gilmore, Grant. 1961. Legal Realism: Its Cause and Cure. Yale Law Journal 70, no. 7 (June): 1037-1048.
Girgis, Sherif, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George. 2012. What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. New York: Encounter Books.
Green, Leslie. 2016. Law and the Role of a Judge. In Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore, ed. Kimberly Kessler Ferzan and Stephen J. Morse, 323-341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, Marvin. 1974. Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches: The Riddles of Culture. New York: Random House.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961) 2012. The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 103, no. 1 (February): 59-81. doi: 10.1017/S000305540909008X.
Kinder, Donald R., and Nathan P. Kalmoe. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leiter, Brian. 2001. Moral Facts and Best Explanations. Social Philosophy & Policy 18, no. 2 (Summer): 79-101. doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002910.
Leiter, Brian. 2012. In Praise of Realism (and Against “Nonsense” Jurisprudence). Georgetown Law Journal 100, no. 3 (March): 865-893.
Leiter, Brian. 2013. The Boundaries of the Moral (and Legal) Community. Alabama Law Review 64, no. 3: 511-531.
Leiter, Brian. 2015a. Normativity for Naturalists. Philosophical Issues: A Supplement to Noûs 25, no. 1 (October): 64-79. doi: 10.1111/phis.12046.
Leiter, Brian. 2015b. Why Marxism Still Does Not Need Normative Theory. Analyse und Kritik 37, no. 1-2 (November): 23-50. doi: 10.1515/auk-2015-1-204.
Leiter, Brian. 2015c. Constitutional Law, Moral Judgment, and the Supreme Court as Super-Legislature. Hastings Law Journal 66, no. 6 (August): 1601-1616.
Leiter, Brian. 2016a. The Paradoxes of Public Philosophy. Indian Journal of Legal Theory 1, no. 1 (May): 51-64.
Leiter, Brian. 2016b. The Case Against Free Speech. Sydney Law Review 38, no. 4 (December): 407-439.
Leiter, Brian. 2018. Legal Positivism about the Artifact Law: A Retrospective Assessment. In Law as an Artifact, ed. Luka Burazin, Kenneth Einar Himma, and Corrado Roversi, 3-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leiter, Brian. 2019. Realism and Moralism in Political Thought. In Post-Truth, Philosophy and Law, ed. T. Andina and A. Condell. London: Routledge.
Moore, Michael. 2016. Michael Moore in TrumpLand. Directed by Michael Moore. Produced by Dog Eat Dog Films and IMG Films.
Morris, Ian. 2015. Forages, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1883) 1976. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In The Portable Nietzsche, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Penguin Books.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1886) 1989. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde, and J. David Velleman. 2015. Konrad Morgen: The Conscience of a Nazi Judge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Posner, Richard A. 1996. Law and Legal Theory in England and America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Richard A. 1999. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Posner, Richard A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rossi, Enzo, and Matt Sleat. 2014. Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass 9, no. 10 (October): 689-701. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12148.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Shahine, Alaa. 2007. Egypt women sworn in as judges despite opposition. Reuters, April 10. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-egypt-women-judges-idUKL1047186020070410. Accessed 3 January 2019.
State of Israel Judicial Authority. n.d. The Judges: Declaration of Allegiance. http://elyon1.court.gov.il/eng/system/index.html. Accessed 27 January 2019.
Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Weigel, David. 2016. How voters who heavily supported Obama switched over to Trump. Washington Post, November 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-voters-who-heavily-supported-obama-switched-over-to-trump/2016/11/10/65019658-a77a-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html?utm_term=.92c3dd91729f.
Williams, Bernard. 2005. Realism and Moralism in Political Theory. In In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, ed. Geoffrey Hawthorn, 1-17. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zlotnick, David M. 1999. Justice Scalia and His Critics: An Exploration of Scalia’s Fidelity to His Constitutional Methodology. Emory Law Journal 48, no. 4 (Fall): 1377-1429.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online após a publicação na revista.